s.271(1)(c)
Supreme Court
Citation [2019] 103 taxmann.com 208 (SC)
name of the case Jivanlal and Sons vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax
============================
IT:
Where High Court confirmed penalty order passed by Tribunal rejecting
assessee's explanation that it had claimed deduction in respect of tax
paid on basis of wrong advice given by Chartered Accountant, SLP filed
against decision of High Court was to be dismissed.
Section 271(1)(c), read with section 37(1), of the Income-tax Act, 1961
- Penalty - For concealment of income (Disallowance of claim, effect
of) - In course of assessment, assessee claimed deduction in respect of
tax paid - Assessing Officer taking a view that amount so paid was an
inadmissible expenditure, disallowed same - He also initiated penalty
proceedings under section 271(1)(c) for raising a false claim for
deduction - Assessee raised a plea that deduction had been claimed on
basis of advice given by Chartered Accountant - Assessing Officer having
rejected assessee's explanation, passed penalty order under section
271(1)(c) - Tribunal confirmed said penalty order - High Court finding
that there was no material in support of assessee's claim either in form
of evidence of assessee or affidavit of Chartered Accountant, upheld
penalty order passed by Tribunal - Whether, on facts, SLP filed against
decision of High Court was to be dismissed - Held, yes [Para 1] [In
favour of revenue]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.