ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (TRIB))
Volume 12 : Part 3 (Issue dated : 14-11-2011)
SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART
Business
expenditure :- --Disallowance--Expenditure on labour
charges--Assessing Officer disallowing 50 per cent. as excessive claim for job
charges--Assessee getting processing of diamonds done by outside parties and
making payment by “account payee cheque”--Expenses within reasonable limits and
also within industry norms--To be allowed--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- J. B.
Brothers v . Addl. CIT (Ahmedabad) . . . 293
Disallowance:-
--Foreign travel, postage, factory expenses etc.--Assessing
Officer disallowing 10 per cent. on ad hoc basis--Assessee producing details of
expenses--Expenses incurred exclusively for business--Not to be
disallowed--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- J. B. Brothers v. Addl. CIT
(Ahmedabad) . . . 293
Penalty :- --Concealment
of income--Income from sale of plants and trees claimed as agricultural
income--Assessing Officer holding that composite sale along with land and
taxing as capital gains--Difference in treatment of receipt--Not a case of
concealment of income--Penalty to be deleted--Income-tax Act, 1961, s.
271(1)(c)-- Abhinav Ajmera v . Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 290
Reassessment :-
--Notice--Information that assessee raised bogus loans--Addition
made on account of receipts of sale of fabrics--No addition on account of any
bogus loans or share capital in assessment order--Proceedings initiated
mechanically on vague grounds and without application of mind--Not
valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 147-- ITO v . Lakshya Exim P. Ltd. (Delhi) . .
. 303
Revision :- --Commissioner
invoking jurisdiction in view of additions made by Assessing Officer based on
statement of director--Additional Commissioner considering and dealing with
relevant aspects and giving directions under section 144A--Direction part of
assessment proceedings and therefore part of assessment order--Direction not
prejudicial to interests of Revenue--Order under section 263 to be
cancelled--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 144A, 263-- ITO v. Arora Alloys Ltd.
(Chandigarh) . . . 263
Unexplained
expenditure :- --Addition based on statement of director
recorded by Central excise authorities--Addition not supported by
evidence--Additions not justified--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 69C-- ITO v. Arora
Alloys Ltd. (Chandigarh) . . . 263
SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART
Income-tax Act, 1961 :
S. 37 :- --Business
expenditure--Disallowance--Expenditure on labour charges--Assessing Officer
disallowing 50 per cent. as excessive claim for job charges--Assessee getting
processing of diamonds done by outside parties and making payment by “account
payee cheque”--Expenses within reasonable limits and also within industry
norms--To be allowed-- J. B. Brothers v. Addl. CIT (Ahmedabad) . . . 293
Business
expenditure:- --Disallowance--Foreign travel, postage, factory
expenses etc.--Assessing Officer disallowing 10 per cent. on ad hoc
basis--Assessee producing details of expenses--Expenses incurred exclusively
for business--Not to be disallowed-- J. B. Brothers v. Addl. CIT (Ahmedabad) .
. . 293
S. 69C :- --Unexplained
expenditure--Addition based on statement of director recorded by Central excise
authorities--Addition not supported by evidence--Additions not justified-- ITO
v. Arora Alloys Ltd. (Chandigarh) . . . 263
S. 144A :- --Revision--Commissioner
invoking jurisdiction in view of additions made by Assessing Officer based on
statement of director--Additional Commissioner considering and dealing with
relevant aspects and giving directions under section 144A--Direction part of
assessment proceedings and therefore part of assessment order--Direction not
prejudicial to interests of Revenue--Order under section 263 to be cancelled--
ITO v. Arora Alloys Ltd. (Chandigarh) . . . 263
S. 147 :- --Reassessment--Notice--Information
that assessee raised bogus loans--Addition made on account of receipts of sale
of fabrics--No addition on account of any bogus loans or share capital in
assessment order--Proceedings initiated mechanically on vague grounds and
without application of mind--Not valid-- ITO v. Lakshya Exim P. Ltd. (Delhi) .
. . 303
S. 263 :- --Revision--Commissioner
invoking jurisdiction in view of additions made by Assessing Officer based on
statement of director--Additional Commissioner considering and dealing with
relevant aspects and giving directions under section 144A--Direction part of
assessment proceedings and therefore part of assessment order--Direction not
prejudicial to interests of Revenue--Order under section 263 to be cancelled--
ITO v. Arora Alloys Ltd. (Chandigarh) . . . 263
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.