DCIT vs M/s. S K Tekriwal
S. 40(a)(ia) of the Act can be invoked only in the
event of non-deduction of tax but not for lesser
deduction of tax.
S. 40(a)(ia) of the Act refers only to the duty to
deduct tax and pay to government account. If there is any shortfall due to any difference
of opinion as to the taxability of any item or the nature of payments falling
under various TDS provisions, the assessee can be declared to be an assessee in
default u/s. 201 of the Act and no disallowance can be made by invoking the
provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act.
In this provision it is provided that where in
respect of any sum, as referred in this section, tax has not been deducted or
after deduction has not been paid on or before the due date specified in
sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act, such sum shall be disallowed as a
deduction while computing the income of the assessee for the previous year
relevant to AY under consideration. But in the present case before us, the
assessee has deducted tax, although u/s. 194C(2) of the Act and it is not a
case of non-deduction of tax or no deduction of tax as is the import of section
40(a)(ia) of the Act. Even otherwise if it is considered that this particular sum
falls under section 194I of the Act, it may be considered as tax deducted at a
lower rate and it cannot be considered a case of non-deduction or no deduction.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.