ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (TRIB))
Volume 10 : Part 2 (Issue dated : 11-07-2011)
SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART
Fee for utilisation of club facilities by executive officer of assessee--Allowable--Sum towards receivables--Not allowable--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
Reimbursement of telephone expenses by assessee to its executives--Perquisites in hands of executives--No addition could be made--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 37-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
Long-term capital gains--Exemption--Sale of shares--Assessee's primary business, dealing in shares--Assessee holding controlling shares in particular company promoted by assessee and treating shares as investment and not in nature of stock-in-trade--Transfer of shares give rise to long-term capital gains--Assessee entitled to exemption--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 10(38)-- Asst. CIT v. Stargate Investments P. Ltd. (Chennai) . . . 211
Exemption--Money utilised by trustee to meet his medical emergency--Trustee not beneficiary and trust entitled to exemption--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 11, 13(3)-- Vempati Chinna Satyam Kuchipudi Art Foundation v. Deputy CIT (Chennai) . . . 201
Commissioner -Revision-Capital gains-Cost of acquisition--Tiles laying, white washing, electrical rewiring and wood work expenses--Are post-acquisition expenses--To be excluded--Brokerage and legal fees--Part of acquisition cost--To be allowed--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 54, 263-- Smt. S. Sudha v. Asst. CIT (Chennai) . . . 206
Depreciation - Higher rate of depreciation--Tractors and trailers--Assessee in business of transportation of goods on hire basis--Entitled to higher rate of depreciation--Circular No. 652 dated June 14, 1993--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 32-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
Property - Annual letting value- Rent Control Act--Prohibition on charging more than standard rent permissible under Act--Assessing Officer directed to compute annual letting value in terms of standard rent payable under Act--Bombay Rent Control Act--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 23-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
Reassessment - Cost of construction- Reference to Valuation Officer--No proceedings pending before Assessing Officer--Assessing Officer has no jurisdiction to refer property for valuation to Valuation Officer--Reassessment notice issued on basis of valuation--Not permissible--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 148-- ITO v. Nisarg Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. (Ahmedabad) . . . 174
Validity of notice - Notice issued after four years--No inquiry in original assessment by Assessing Officer nor disclosure by assessee as to nexus between interest received and interest payment--Non-application of mind by Assessing Officer during original assessment--Reassessment valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- Nancy Krafts P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 193
SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART
for services rendered outside India - Tax not deductible at source--Fees for technical services--Insulator testing, advertising, etc.--Not technical services--Tax not deductible at source--Circular No. 786, dated February 7, 2000--Circular No. 7, dated 22-10-2009-- Asst. CIT v. Modern Insulator Ltd. (Jaipur) . . . 147
services rendered outside India - Tax not deductible at source--Fees for technical services--Insulator testing, advertising, etc.--Not technical services--Tax not deductible at source--Circular No. 786, dated February 7, 2000--Circular No. 7, dated 22-10-2009-- Asst. CIT v. Modern Insulator Ltd. (Jaipur) . . . 147
services rendered outside India - Tax not deductible at source - Fees for technical services--Insulator testing, advertising, etc.--Not technical services--Tax not deductible at source--Circular No. 786, dated February 7, 2000--Circular No. 7, dated 22-10-2009-- Asst. CIT v. Modern Insulator Ltd. (Jaipur) . . . 147
for services rendered outside India - Tax not deductible at source - Fees for technical services--Insulator testing, advertising, etc.--Not technical services--Tax not deductible at source--Circular No. 786, dated February 7, 2000--Circular No. 7, dated 22-10-2009-- Asst. CIT v. Modern Insulator Ltd. (Jaipur) . . . 147
interested- Loan to shareholder holding more than 10 per cent. voting rights--Loan out of accumulated profits--No evidence that loan was for purposes of business of company--Loan assessable as deemed dividend-- Mrs. Kiran Bansal v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 180
services rendered outside India- Tax not deductible at source - Fees for technical services--Insulator testing, advertising, etc.--Not technical services--Tax not deductible at source--Circular No. 786, dated February 7, 2000--Circular No. 7, dated 22-10-2009-- Asst. CIT v. Modern Insulator Ltd. (Jaipur) . . . 147
in traditional art forms- Assessee entitled to exemption-- Vempati Chinna Satyam Kuchipudi Art Foundation v. Deputy CIT (Chennai) . . . 201
beneficiary and trust entitled to exemption-- Vempati Chinna Satyam Kuchipudi Art Foundation v. Deputy CIT (Chennai) . . . 201
Trustee not beneficiary and trust entitled to exemption-- Vempati Chinna Satyam Kuchipudi Art Foundation v. Deputy CIT (Chennai) . . . 201
rent permissible under Act--Assessing Officer directed to compute annual letting value in terms of standard rent payable under Act--Bombay Rent Control Act-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
transportation of goods on hire basis- Entitled to higher rate of depreciation--Circular No. 652 dated June 14, 1993-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
evidence- Disallowance of fifty per cent. -Proper-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
not encashed by department--Disallowance justified-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
Allowable--Sum towards receivables--Not allowable-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
Perquisites in hands of executives--No addition could be made-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
for services rendered outside India--Tax not deductible at source--Fees for technical services--Insulator testing, advertising, etc.--Not technical services--Tax not deductible at source--Circular No. 786, dated February 7, 2000--Circular No. 7, dated 22-10-2009-- Asst. CIT v. Modern Insulator Ltd. (Jaipur) . . . 147
charges paid to sister concern--Tug not used for any transportation during relevant period--No case for commercial expediency of payment to sister concern--Disallowance justified-- Urmila and Co. Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Mumbai) . . . 217
of understatement of sale consideration--Assessing Officer to adopt sale consideration of shares as disclosed by assessee-- Deputy CIT v. Jindal Equipment Leasing and Consultancy Services Ltd. (Delhi) . . . 128
electrical rewiring and wood work expenses--Are post-acquisition expenses--To be excluded--Brokerage and legal fees--Part of acquisition cost--To be allowed-- Smt. S. Sudha v. Asst. CIT (Chennai) . . . 206
Officer has no power to extend period of limitation--Assessment order passed on 29-8-2005 barred by limitation-- Deputy CIT v. Ramachandra Dashrath Hande and Co. (Mumbai) . . . 117
assessment by AO nor disclosure by assessee as to nexus between interest received and interest payment--Non-application of mind by Assessing Officer during original assessment--Reassessment valid-- Nancy Krafts P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 193
pending before Assessing Officer--Assessing Officer has no jurisdiction to refer property for valuation to Valuation Officer--Reassessment notice issued on basis of valuation--Not permissible-- ITO v. Nisarg Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. (Ahmedabad) . . . 174
by Assessing Officer nor disclosure by assessee as to nexus between interest received and interest payment--Non-application of mind by Assessing Officer during original assessment--Reassessment valid-- Nancy Krafts P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) . . . 193
electrical rewiring and wood work expenses--Are post-acquisition expenses--To be excluded--Brokerage and legal fees--Part of acquisition cost--To be allowed-- Smt. S. Sudha v. Asst. CIT (Chennai) . . . 206
assessing authority to levy penalty where it is imperative--Assessee claiming expenses as part of acquisition cost on a bona fide belief--Penalty cannot be imposed-- Smt. S. Sudha v. Asst. CIT (Chennai) . . . 206
acquisition cost on a bona fide belief--Penalty cannot be imposed--Smt. S. Sudha v. Asst. CIT (Chennai) . . . 206
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.