ITR(Trib) Vol 6 Part 5 dated 29-11-2010

ITR'S TRIBUNAL TAX REPORTS (ITR (Trib)) HIGHLIGHTS ISSUE DATED 29-11-2010

Volume 6 Part 5

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ORDERS

 

 

>> Where claim of provision for doubtful debts disclosed in account, discharge of burden by assessee u/s. 271(1)(c), Expln. 1, levy of penalty not justified : Asst. CIT v. Nuchem Ltd. (Delhi) p. 429

>> Claim of set-off of long-term capital loss against business income of current year after applying indexed cost of acquisition, not permissible u/s. 71, penalty justified : Asst. CIT v. Nuchem Ltd. (Delhi) p. 429

>> Disclosure of rental income after enquiry by AO under compulsion, penalty justified u/s. 271(1)(c) : Asst. CIT v. Nuchem Ltd. (Delhi) p. 429

>> Adjustment to opening WDV of assets result of WDV finally worked out in earlier years, deletion of penalty justified : Asst. CIT v. Nuchem Ltd. (Delhi) p. 429

>> Management and selling commission paid to non-resident lead managers by Indian company in connection with issue of GDRs, not taxable : Dy. DIT v. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. (Mumbai) p. 463

>> Where deduction allowed on entire indexed cost of acquisition of land with trees, part of sale proceeds not agricultural income : Abhinav Ajmera v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) p. 482

>> Derivative transactions carried out in previous year relevant to assessment year 2006-07 ; business income : Smt. Seema Jain v. Asst. CIT (Delhi) p. 488

>> Admission of cash payments exceeding specified limit under compulsion during search, retracted by assessee, addition u/s. 40A(3) reduced : Sona Bazaar v. Asst. CIT (Bangalore) p. 492

>> Exclusion of reimbursement of advertisement expenditure for determining profit level indicator not proper : Panasonic India P. Ltd. v. ITO (Delhi) p. 502

>> Data for comparison to be data relating to year in which international transaction entered into : Panasonic India P. Ltd. v. ITO (Delhi) p. 502

--
Me on net :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://rajkumaratthenet.blogspot.com/
http://itronline.blogspot.com/

Virus Warning: Although the I have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in his email, sender (I) cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."