Showing posts with label Case law Digest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Case law Digest. Show all posts

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Direct Tax Laws Oct 2011 10


Direct Tax  Laws

Aeroplane and Aircraft are same thing; Aircraft cannot be held to be 'plant and machinery' and allowed depreciation less than 40 per cent.Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits made to Airport Authority of India, may be allowable - [2011] 14 taxmann 115 (Delhi - Trib.)

Assessing Officer is not empowered to travel beyond specific issues contained in order of remand passed by Commissioner (Appeals) - [2011] 14 taxmann 118 (Gujarat)

Benefit under section 23(1)(c) cannot be extended to a case where a property is not let out at all during previous year - [2011] 14 taxmann 146 (Andhra Pradesh)

Clause (i) of Explanation 1 to Section 115JB(2) was made effective from 1-4-2001 and would, therefore, apply to assessment year 2001-02 and subsequent assessment years - [2011] 14 taxmann 121 (Punjab and Haryana)

In view of amendment in section 80HHC(3) with effect from 1-4-1991, deduction is required to be computed by aggregating profits, export turnover and total turnover of all businesses carried on by assessee - [2011] 14 taxmann 117 (Calcutta)

It is not proper for Tribunal to remand matter without attempting to settle matter at its stage - [2011] 14 taxmann 143 (Karnataka)

Liberty is to be given to department to move to High Court pointing out that Instruction No. 3, dated 9-2-2011 should not be applied ipso facto - [2011] 14 taxmann 142 (SC)

Provision made towards irrecoverability of debt cannot be said to be provision for liability under clause (c) of Explanation to section 115J(IA) - [2011] 14 taxmann 147 (Calcutta)

Remand can be for rectification of specific points of mistakes - [2011] 14 taxmann 119 (Calcutta)

Sub-letting charges to DDA are not deductible under proviso to section 23(1) - [2011] 14 taxmann 116(Delhi - Trib.)

Supply of foods to international flights leaving India after customs clearance would be export when RBI has treated payment in Indian rupee as convertible foreign exchange - [2011] 14 taxmann 113 (Calcutta)

When in view of business exigency AMC charges from mutual funds expenditure lesser than that actually spent, no addition can be made to income of company - [2011] 14 taxmann 144 (Bombay)

Where a charitable society merges with another society having similar objects, registration granted under section 12AA cannot be withdrawn - [2011] 14 taxmann 114 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Where assessee had furnished details with respect to deposits which investors acknowledged, assessee was not required to prove genuineness of transactions or creditworthiness of investors - [2011] 14 taxmann 150 (Delhi)

Where issue involved is debatable, an intimation under section 143(1)(a) disallowing claim based on such debatable issue on ground that it is prima facie inadmissible, cannot be sustained - [2011] 14 taxmann 122 (Delhi - Trib.)

Where land owner entered into agreement with developers and, received certain sum and a part of build-up area as consideration, capital gain would be assessable in year in which possession of property was handed over, and not in year in which project was completed - [2011] 14 taxmann 120 (Karnataka)

Without showing valid reasoning, value of excess stock found at time of survey cannot be drastically reduced on ground that some of items valued at market price were merely scrap - [2011] 14 taxmann 124 (Delhi - Trib.)

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Direct Tax Laws Oct 2011 06

Direct Tax  Laws

Where all relevant details had been made available by assessee before Assessing Officer who after detailed consideration of all details, made original assessment, reopening of assessment was unjustified - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 48 (Gujarat)

Rule 3(5) nowhere provides that while determining value of perquisite, wherever it exceeds Rs. 1,000 per month, amount of Rs. 1,000 per month has to be reduced from value of such perquisite - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 45 (Punjab and Haryana)

Where assessee was only a housewife and was not having any source of income, addition could not be made in assessee's hands on basis of her admission during survey in absence of any corroborative evidence - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 50 (Jaipur - Trib.)

A reference under section 142A is to be made for purpose of determination of fair market value of investment covered under section 69, 69A and 69B and not for purpose of computation of capital gains under section 48 - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 44 (Delhi - Trib.)

Any advance received and forfeited by assessee upon cancellation of sale of capital asset has to be reduced from cost of acquisition by applying section 51 - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 43 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Portfolio management fee is not allowable as deduction while computing short-term capital gain arising from sale of shares - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 42 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Profit or gain would arise only when transfer has been made at a price which is more than cost price and difference between cost price and amount at which transfer has taken place can be charged under section 45(3) - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 41 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Income from sale of bonsai plant grown by assessee in nursery/farm is agricultural income - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 40 (Cuttack - Trib.)

Order passed by DRP should be a speaking order - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 39 (Delhi - Trib.)

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Direct Tax Laws Oct 2011 09

DRP's order, if not speaking, is to be adjudicated afresh - [2011] 14 taxmann 97 (DELHI - ITAT)

HSBC and ICICI banks are not State Financial Corporation or State Industrial Investment Corporation for purposes of section 43B(d) - [2011] 14 taxmann 83 (MUM. - ITAT)

Increase in gross profit rate on account of inflated expenses and suppressed gross profits, unless controverted, should be accepted - [2011] 14 taxmann 88 (PUNJ. & HAR.)

Provision for warranty is an allowable business expenditure - [2011] 14 taxmann 84 (KAR.)

Requirement of recording of satisfaction under section 153C cannot be substituted by furnishing an appraisal note which is prepared by search party after completion of search - [2011] 14 taxmann 93 (INDORE - ITAT)

Transfer pricing : To be comparables, nature and line of business, product or service, market, size and scope of operation and stage of business, etc., should be similar - [2011] 14 taxmann 96 (DELHI - ITAT)

Where assessee accepted addition of undisclosed credit as he could not secure presence of creditor though confirmation letters had been filed, levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not justified - [2011] 14 taxmann 85 (KAR.)

Where audited books of account along with vouchers were produced, assessee's claim of expenditure could not be disallowed - [2011] 14 taxmann 87 (PUNJ. & HAR.)

Where expenditure on religious activities is more than 5 per cent of total Income, trust cannot be issued certificate of exemption under section 80G - [2011] 14 taxmann 92 (VISAKHAPATNAM - ITAT)

Where full value of consideration is equal to valuation done by stamp valuation authorities, reference to DVO for determining fair market value is not valid - [2011] 14 taxmann 95 (ALL. - ITAT)

Where scrap sold by assessee was derived from dismantling of constructed buildings, it was not required to collect tax at source from buyer - [2011] 14 taxmann 94 (RAJKOT - ITAT)

Where there was dispute in respect of concession granted by revenue qua computation of profit rate from civil construction business, matter was to be remanded - [2011] 14 taxmann 86 (PUNJ. & HAR.)

Friday, October 14, 2011

Direct Tax Laws Oct 2011 08

On expiry of tax holiday period under section 10B, block of assets, viz., plant and machineries of industry are available for working out relief under section 50(2) - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 82 (Madras)

Transfer pricing - Rule 10B nowhere provides that comparable uncontrolled transaction shall be only an international transaction - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 91 (New Delhi - Trib.)

Losses on sale and purchase of shares would not be treated as speculation losses of assessee engaged in bills rediscounting activities - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 81 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Where assessee which was an association related to trade had incurred revenue expenses solely for purpose of protection of common interest of its members it would be allowable as deduction under section 44A - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 80 (Delhi - Trib.)

A partner of a firm is an individual only even if he is partner as a representative of HUF and, thus, where salary is paid to such a partner for conducting affairs of business of firm, it has to be allowed as deduction in view of Explanation 4 to section 40(b) - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 79 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)

Assessee not entitled to deduction under section 80-IB(10) where it sold plots to respective customers by registering a sale deed and thereafter it constructed building at an agreed price - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 78 (Indore - Trib.)

Where assessee, a non-resident company, carried out work of offshore transportation and installation of pipelines in territorial waters of India through its vassels, it could be said to have a fixed place of business in India in terms of paragraph (1) of article 5 of Indo-Mauritius DTAA - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 77 (Delhi - Trib.)

If stock-in-trade is converted into investment and sold later on, difference between sale price of shares and their indexed cost of acquisition should be computed as capital gain - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 76 (Chennai - Trib.)

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Direct Tax Laws Oct 2011 07

Even in a case of composite amount payment, unless assessee approaches the Officer for a certificate under section 195(2) for applying doctrine of proportionality, entire amount has to suffer for deduction under section 195(1) - [2011] 14 taxmann 73 (Madras)

Where undertaking in STPI zone is maiden business of assessee, and it was not formed by splitting/reconstruction of any existing undertaking, section 10A exemption will be available - [2011] 14 taxmann 68 (Karnataka)

Pending Larger Bench decision of Supreme Court on surcharge to be levied in case of block assessment, matter should be remanded - [2011] 14 taxmann 67 (Karnataka)

An erroneous assessment order cannot be subject matter for rectification under section 154 - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 61 (Madras)

Where overdraft was used for investment in shares of sister concern to have control over it, interest paid to bank would be deductible - [2011] 14 taxmann 58 (Bombay)

Collecting jewellery of 906.900 gms by a woman in form of 'stree dhan' or on other occasions such as birth of a child, etc. in a married life of 25 years is not abnormal and cannot be treated as unexplained jewellery under section 69A - [2011] 14 taxmann 57 (Delhi)

Company purchasing mutual funds from accumulated profit, is not to subject to section 14A disallowance of interest on borrowed capital - [2011] 14 taxmann 71 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Explanation under section 54F qua combined adjacent flats where assessee failed to establish that such construction was legally permitted by Municipal Authorities - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 70 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Reimbursement of medical expenses to employees is not liable to FBT.Refreshment snacks provided to customers by bank is not liable to FBT - [2011] 14 taxmann 65 (Bangalore - Trib.)

Where AO of non-resident contractor company issued certificate for 'NIL' deduction of tax at source under section 194C(4) from payment to be made to it and accordingly, assessee did not deduct tax from payments made, no penalty could be levied on ground that certificate was required to be obtained under section 195 as contractor company was a non-resident - [2011] 14 taxmann 60 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)

Where assessee-charitable society having applied more than 85 per cent of its income in terms of section 11, claimed depreciation on its fixed assets, there was no question of double deduction and, thus, assessee's claim was to be allowed - [2011] 14 taxmann 59 (Indore - Trib.)

Direct Tax Laws Oct 2011 06

Direct Tax  Laws

Where all relevant details had been made available by assessee before Assessing Officer who after detailed consideration of all details, made original assessment, reopening of assessment was unjustified - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 48 (Gujarat)

Rule 3(5) nowhere provides that while determining value of perquisite, wherever it exceeds Rs. 1,000 per month, amount of Rs. 1,000 per month has to be reduced from value of such perquisite - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 45 (Punjab and Haryana)

Where assessee was only a housewife and was not having any source of income, addition could not be made in assessee's hands on basis of her admission during survey in absence of any corroborative evidence - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 50 (Jaipur - Trib.)

A reference under section 142A is to be made for purpose of determination of fair market value of investment covered under section 69, 69A and 69B and not for purpose of computation of capital gains under section 48 - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 44 (Delhi - Trib.)

Any advance received and forfeited by assessee upon cancellation of sale of capital asset has to be reduced from cost of acquisition by applying section 51 - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 43 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Portfolio management fee is not allowable as deduction while computing short-term capital gain arising from sale of shares - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 42 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Profit or gain would arise only when transfer has been made at a price which is more than cost price and difference between cost price and amount at which transfer has taken place can be charged under section 45(3) - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 41 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Income from sale of bonsai plant grown by assessee in nursery/farm is agricultural income - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 40 (Cuttack - Trib.)

Order passed by DRP should be a speaking order - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 39 (Delhi - Trib.)

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Direct Tax Laws Oct 2011 05

The right granted for use of a copyrighted article for a consideration would be royalty, though that right granted may be limited and does not take in a right to further transfer the right or its use - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 17 (AAR - New Delhi)

Excise duty paid need not be added in valuation of closing stock when items of stock continue to lay with assessee - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 21 (Karnataka)

Where Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings taking a view that assessee had wrongly adjusted speculation loss on account of Futures & Options transactions against short-term capital gain arising from sale of shares, in view of fact that earlier Assessing Officer himself had accepted Futures & Options transactions to be non-speculative in nature being hedging transaction - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 37 (Mumbai - Trib.)

Where assessee had sold his proprietary concern as a going concern for a consideration to a company and received consideration by way of allotment of shares of company and retained more than 51 per cent of shareholding in company for a period of six years, sale transaction was a transfer within meaning of section 47(xiv) - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 27 (Chennai - Trib.)

Application of Article 7 of Indo-Korean DTAA - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 26 (Delhi - Trib.)

Where a specific order was passed by Joint Commissioner authorizing TRO to work as Assessing Officer by virtue of powers vested in her by section 120(5), assessment order passed by TRO - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 25 (Indore - Trib.)

Where Assessing Officer made adjustment to armā?Ts length price determined by assessee relying upon higher per man hour rate charged by its comparable, in view of fact that said comparable was a large industrial undertaking whereas assessee was a new entrant in field, impugned order was to be set aside - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 24 (Hyderabad - Trib.)

Where assessee had not shown annual value of property for which it might reasonably be let out from year to year but adopted rent received which was highly depressed due to receipt of huge interest-free security deposit, penalty under section 271(1)(c) was to be levied upon assessee - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 23 (Delhi - Trib.)

Where assessee had entered into a development agreement in terms of which he transferred his land and building to developer through a document, which had been registered by State Registration Authorities, it was a case of transfer of capital asset - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 20 (Mumbai - Trib.)

There is nothing in section 92CA to suggest that AO should hear assessee or record reasons before making a reference to TPO nor is there anything in section to suggest that AO should ask assessee whether he should himself proceed to determine arm's length price or should involve TPO for this purpose - [2011] 14 taxmann.com 19 (Bangalore - Trib.)

Saturday, October 8, 2011

INCOME TAX REPORTS (ITR) Volume 337 : Part 4 Issue dated 3-10-2011 :- SUBJECT INDEX


INCOME TAX REPORTS (ITR)
Volume 337 : Part 4 (Issue dated 3-10-2011)
SUBJECT INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

HIGH COURTS

Advance tax :-- Failure to pay advance tax--Deferment of advance tax--Interest under sections 234B and 234C--Condition precedent--Liability to pay advance tax on last day of accounting year--Liability arising due to subsequent amendment of provision with retrospective effect--Interest could not be levied--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 234B, 234C-- Emami Ltd. v. CIT (Cal) . . . 470

Appeal to Appellate Tribunal: - Merger of order of Assessing Officer in appellate order--Issue not dealt with by Tribunal--No merger of order--Rectification of mistake with regard to such issue--Valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 154, 254-- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Appeal to High Court: - Monetary limits for appeals by Department--Instructions of CBDT specifying limit--Exceptions--Substantial question of law likely to arise repeatedly--Assessability of wealth-tax on semi-constructed buildings on urban land--Exception clause (3) of Instruction No. 2 of 2005 applicable--Appeal maintainable--Wealth-tax Act, 1957, s. 27A-- CWT v. John L. Chackola (Ker) . . . 385

Business: - Income from other sources--Income from other sources or business income--Commission--Assessee carrying on business of distribution of computers--Transfer of business--Transferee paying commission to assessee--Commission allowed as business expenditure in hands of transferee--Commission assessable as business income of assessee--Income-tax Act, 1961 s. 28-- CIT v. FX Info Technologies P. Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 526

Business expenditure: - General principles--Resolution by company on account of pension--Liability worked out on actuarial basis--Not deductible--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 36, 37-- Brooke Bond India Ltd . v. Joint CIT (Cal) . . . 482

Capital gains: - Slump sale--Meaning of--Sale of undertaking as a going concern for a lump sum--Sale was a slump sale--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 50B-- CIT v. Accelerated Freeze Drying Co. Ltd . (Ker) . . . 440

Deemed dividend: - Advance on salary and commission received by managing director--Advance on salary not assessable as deemed dividend--Advance on commission assessable as deemed dividend--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 2(22)(e)-- Shyama Charan Gupta v. CIT (All) . . . 511

Income from other sources: - Business income--Assessee establishing to set up power plant--Delay in remitting security deposit by investing company resulting rejection of bid of assessee--Disputes before arbitration tribunal and High Court--Deposit returned kept as fixed deposits--Interest on fixed deposits--Assessable as income from other sources--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 28, 56-- CIT v. Madhya Bharat Energy Corporation Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 389

Industrial undertaking: - Special deduction under sections 80HH and 80-I--Condition precedent--Income should be derived from industrial undertaking--Interest on fixed deposits--Not entitled to special deduction--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 80HH, 80-I-- CIT v. Navbharat Explosives Co. P. Ltd. (Chhattisgarh) . . . 515

Interpretation of taxing statutes: - Reasonable interpretation-- Rai Bahadur G. V. Swaika Estates P. Ltd . v. Chief CIT (Cal) . . . 425

Loss: - Speculation--Carry forward and set off--Loss on purchase and sale of shares--Effect of Explanation to section 73--Finding that principal business of assessee was granting of loans--Loss from share dealing could be carried forward and set off against business income--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 72, 73-- PCBL Industrial Ltd . v. CIT (Cal) . . . 536

Offences and prosecution: - Fabricating false evidence--Assessee a tax practitioner, submitted return and certificate of tax deduction at source on behalf of client--Refund granted on basis thereof--Certificate found bogus and consequential refund obtained by fraud--Prosecution of assessee--No evidence to show assessee fabricated bogus certificate--No investigation to show client was a fictitious person--Acquittal justified--Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ss. 193, 196, 420, 468, 471--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 277-- ITO v. R. Soundararajan (Mad) . . . 531

Purchase of immovable property by Central Government: - Tendering of apparent consideration--Scope of section 269UG--Amount can be tendered through Appropriate Authority--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 269UF, 269UG-- Rai Bahadur G. V. Swaika Estates P. Ltd . v. Chief CIT (Cal) . . . 425

Reassessment: - Notice--Validity--Effect of Explanation 2(b) to section 147--Return submitted but no assessment made--Discovery of understatement of income--Notice under section 148--Valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 147, 148-- CIT v. Madhya Bharat Energy Corporation Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 389

Notice after four years--No Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment--Notice based on subsequent decision of High Court--Not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961 s. 148-- Gujarat State Co-op. Agri. and Rural Develop. Bank Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Guj) . . . 447

Rectification of mistake: - Mistake apparent from record--Bad debts--Provision that after 1-4-1989 assessee need not establish that debt had become irrecoverable--Failure to apply correct law--Deduction under section 36(1)(vii) a debatable issue--Rectification not permissible--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 36(1)(vii), 154-- CIT v. Jindal Stainless Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 495

Mistake apparent from record: - Failure to treat tax paid by employer on behalf of employees as salary for purposes of rule 3--Mistake which could be corrected --Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 15, 16, 17, 154--Income-tax Rules, 1962, r. 3-- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Reference: - Appeal to High Court--Competency of appeal or reference--Monetary limits laid down in circulars--Competency to be decided on basis of circular in force on date of appeal or reference--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 256, 260A-- CIT v. Navbharat Explosives Co. P. Ltd. (Chhattisgarh) . . . 515

Salary: - Perquisites--Tax paid by employer on behalf of employee--Part of salary--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 15, 16, 17--Income-tax Rules, 1962, r. 3-- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Search and seizure: - Assessment in search cases--Notice under section 153A and questionnaires calling for details sent--Whether further notice under section 143(2) should be sent--Not necessary--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 143(2), 153A-- Ashok Chaddha v. ITO (Delhi) . . . 399

Block assessment: - Undisclosed income--Additions made not based on material discovered during search--Not valid--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 158BB-- CIT v. Templeton Asset Management (India) P. Ltd. (Bom) . . . 541

Block assessment: - Undisclosed income--Debentures shown in books of account--Interest on debentures whether includible on accrual--Question to be decided in regular assessment and not in block assessment--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 158BB-- CIT v. Templeton Asset Management (India) P. Ltd . (Bom) . . . 541

Speculative transaction: - Law applicable--Effect of amendment of proviso to section 43(5) w.e.f. 1-4-2006--Amendment not retrospective--Derivative transaction carried on in accounting year relevant to assessment year 2003-04--Speculative transaction--Loss incurred not a business loss--Income-tax Act, 1961, s. 43(5)-- CIT v. Bharat R. Ruia (HUF) (Bom) . . . 452

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

Non-resident: - India liaison office engaged in purchase of goods and also carrying out vendor identification and recommendation, review of costing data, quality control and uploading of material prices into internal product data management system--Activities not confined to purchase of goods for export alone--Liaison office is permanent establishment and income attributable to it assessable in India--Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 5(2), 9(1)(i), Explns. 1(b), 2--Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and U. S. A., arts. 5, 7(1)-- Columbia Sportswear Company, In re . . . 407

SECTIONWISE INDEX TO CASES REPORTED IN THIS PART

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 :

Ss. 193, 196, 420, 468, 471: - Offences and prosecution--Fabricating false evidence--Assessee a tax practitioner, submitted return and certificate of tax deduction at source on behalf of client--Refund granted on basis thereof--Certificate found bogus and consequential refund obtained by fraud--Prosecution of assessee--No evidence to show assessee fabricated bogus certificate--No investigation to show client was a fictitious person--Acquittal justified-- ITO v. R. Soundararajan (Mad) . . . 531

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and U. S. A. :

Arts. 5, 7(1): - Non-resident--India liaison office engaged in purchase of goods and also carrying out vendor identification and recommendation, review of costing data, quality control and uploading of material prices into internal product data management system--Activities not confined to purchase of goods for export alone--Liaison office is permanent establishment and income attributable to it assessable in India-- Columbia Sportswear Company, In re (AAR) . . . 407

Income-tax Act, 1961 :

S. 2(22)(e): - Deemed dividend--Advance on salary and commission received by managing director--Advance on salary not assessable as deemed dividend--Advance on commission assessable as deemed dividend-- Shyama Charan Gupta v. CIT (All) . . . 511

S. 5(2): - Non-resident--India liaison office engaged in purchase of goods and also carrying out vendor identification and recommendation, review of costing data, quality control and uploading of material prices into internal product data management system--Activities not confined to purchase of goods for export alone--Liaison office is permanent establishment and income attributable to it assessable in India-- Columbia Sportswear Company, In re (AAR) . . . 407

S. 9(1)(i), Explns. 1(b), 2: - Non-resident--India liaison office engaged in purchase of goods and also carrying out vendor identification and recommendation, review of costing data, quality control and uploading of material prices into internal product data management system--Activities not confined to purchase of goods for export alone--Liaison office is permanent establishment and income attributable to it assessable in India-- Columbia Sportswear Company, In re (AAR) . . . 407

S. 15: - Rectification of mistake--Mistake apparent from record--Failure to treat tax paid by employer on behalf of employees as salary for purposes of rule 3--Mistake which could be corrected -- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Salary :-- Perquisites--Tax paid by employer on behalf of employee--Part of salary-- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

S. 16: - Rectification of mistake--Mistake apparent from record--Failure to treat tax paid by employer on behalf of employees as salary for purposes of rule 3--Mistake which could be corrected -- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Salary--Perquisites--Tax paid by employer on behalf of employee--Part of salary-- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

S. 17: - Rectification of mistake--Mistake apparent from record--Failure to treat tax paid by employer on behalf of employees as salary for purposes of rule 3--Mistake which could be corrected -- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Salary: - Perquisites--Tax paid by employer on behalf of employee--Part of salary-- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

S. 28: - Business--Income from other sources--Income from other sources or business income--Commission--Assessee carrying on business of distribution of computers--Transfer of business--Transferee paying commission to assessee--Commission allowed as business expenditure in hands of transferee--Commission assessable as business income of assessee-- CIT v. FX Info Technologies P. Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 526

Income from other sources: - Business income--Assessee establishing to set up power plant--Delay in remitting security deposit by investing company resulting rejection of bid of assessee--Disputes before arbitration tribunal and High Court--Deposit returned kept as fixed deposits--Interest on fixed deposits--Assessable as income from other sources-- CIT v. Madhya Bharat Energy Corporation Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 389

S. 36: - Business expenditure--General principles--Resolution by company on account of pension--Liability worked out on actuarial basis--Not deductible-- Brooke Bond India Ltd . v. Joint CIT (Cal) . . . 482

S. 36(1)(vii): - Rectification of mistake--Mistake apparent from record--Bad debts--Provision that after 1-4-1989 assessee need not establish that debt had become irrecoverable--Failure to apply correct law--Deduction under section 36(1)(vii) a debatable issue--Rectification not permissible-- CIT v. Jindal Stainless Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 495

S. 37: - Business expenditure--General principles--Resolution by company on account of pension--Liability worked out on actuarial basis--Not deductible-- Brooke Bond India Ltd . v. Joint CIT (Cal) . . . 482

S. 43(5): - Speculative transaction--Law applicable--Effect of amendment of proviso to section 43(5) w.e.f. 1-4-2006--Amendment not retrospective--Derivative transaction carried on in accounting year relevant to assessment year 2003-04--Speculative transaction--Loss incurred not a business loss-- CIT v. Bharat R. Ruia (HUF) (Bom) . . . 452

S. 50B: - Capital gains--Slump sale--Meaning of--Sale of undertaking as a going concern for a lump sum--Sale was a slump sale-- CIT v. Accelerated Freeze Drying Co. Ltd . (Ker) . . . 440

S. 56: - Income from other sources--Business income--Assessee establishing to set up power plant--Delay in remitting security deposit by investing company resulting rejection of bid of assessee--Disputes before arbitration tribunal and High Court--Deposit returned kept as fixed deposits--Interest on fixed deposits--Assessable as income from other sources-- CIT v. Madhya Bharat Energy Corporation Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 389

S. 72: - Loss--Speculation--Carry forward and set off--Loss on purchase and sale of shares--Effect of Explanation to section 73--Finding that principal business of assessee was granting of loans--Loss from share dealing could be carried forward and set off against business income-- PCBL Industrial Ltd . v. CIT (Cal) . . . 536

S. 73: - Loss--Speculation--Carry forward and set off--Loss on purchase and sale of shares--Effect of Explanation to section 73--Finding that principal business of assessee was granting of loans--Loss from share dealing could be carried forward and set off against business income-- PCBL Industrial Ltd . v. CIT (Cal) . . . 536

S. 80-I: - Industrial undertaking--Special deduction under sections 80HH and 80-I--Condition precedent--Income should be derived from industrial undertaking--Interest on fixed deposits--Not entitled to special deduction-- CIT v. Navbharat Explosives Co. P. Ltd. (Chhattisgarh) . . . 515

S. 80HH: - Industrial undertaking--Special deduction under sections 80HH and 80-I --Condition precedent--Income should be derived from industrial undertaking--Interest on fixed deposits--Not entitled to special deduction-- CIT v. Navbharat Explosives Co. P. Ltd. (Chhattisgarh) . . . 515

S. 143(2): - Search and seizure--Assessment in search cases--Notice under section 153A and questionnaires calling for details sent--Whether further notice under section 143(2) should be sent--Not necessary-- Ashok Chaddha v. ITO (Delhi) . . . 399

S. 147: - Reassessment--Notice--Validity--Effect of Explanation 2(b) to section 147--Return submitted but no assessment made--Discovery of understatement of income--Notice under section 148--Valid-- CIT v. Madhya Bharat Energy Corporation Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 389

S. 148: - Reassessment--Notice after four years--No Failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment--Notice based on subsequent decision of High Court--Not valid-- Gujarat State Co-op. Agri. and Rural Develop. Bank Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (Guj) . . . 447

Reassessment: - Notice--Validity--Effect of Explanation 2(b) to section 147--Return submitted but no assessment made--Discovery of understatement of income--Notice under section 148--Valid-- CIT v. Madhya Bharat Energy Corporation Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 389

S. 153A: - Search and seizure--Assessment in search cases--Notice under section 153A and questionnaires calling for details sent--Whether further notice under section 143(2) should be sent--Not necessary-- Ashok Chaddha v. ITO (Delhi) . . . 399

S. 154: - Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Merger of order of Assessing Officer in appellate order--Issue not dealt with by Tribunal--No merger of order--Rectification of mistake with regard to such issue--Valid-- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Rectification of mistake: - Mistake apparent from record--Bad debts--Provision that after 1-4-1989 assessee need not establish that debt had become irrecoverable--Failure to apply correct law--Deduction under section 36(1)(vii) a debatable issue--Rectification not permissible-- CIT v. Jindal Stainless Ltd . (Delhi) . . . 495

Rectification of mistake: - Mistake apparent from record--Failure to treat tax paid by employer on behalf of employees as salary for purposes of rule 3--Mistake which could be corrected -- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

S. 158BB: - Search and seizure--Block assessment--Undisclosed income--Additions made not based on material discovered during search--Not valid-- CIT v. Templeton Asset Management (India) P. Ltd. (Bom) . . . 541

Search and seizure--Block assessment--Undisclosed income--Debentures shown in books of account--Interest on debentures whether includible on accrual--Question to be decided in regular assessment and not in block assessment-- CIT v. Templeton Asset Management (India) P. Ltd . (Bom) . . . 541

S. 234B: - Advance tax--Failure to pay advance tax--Deferment of advance tax--Interest under sections 234B and 234C--Condition precedent--Liability to pay advance tax on last day of accounting year--Liability arising due to subsequent amendment of provision with retrospective effect--Interest could not be levied-- Emami Ltd. v. CIT (Cal) . . . 470

S. 234C: - Advance tax--Failure to pay advance tax--Deferment of advance tax--Interest under sections 234B and 234C--Condition precedent--Liability to pay advance tax on last day of accounting year--Liability arising due to subsequent amendment of provision with retrospective effect--Interest could not be levied-- Emami Ltd. v. CIT (Cal) . . . 470

S. 254: - Appeal to Appellate Tribunal--Merger of order of Assessing Officer in appellate order--Issue not dealt with by Tribunal--No merger of order--Rectification of mistake with regard to such issue--Valid-- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

S. 256: - Reference--Appeal to High Court--Competency of appeal or reference--Monetary limits laid down in circulars--Competency to be decided on basis of circular in force on date of appeal or reference-- CIT v. Navbharat Explosives Co. P. Ltd. (Chhattisgarh) . . . 515

S. 260A: - Reference--Appeal to High Court--Competency of appeal or reference--Monetary limits laid down in circulars--Competency to be decided on basis of circular in force on date of appeal or reference-- CIT v. Navbharat Explosives Co. P. Ltd. (Chhattisgarh) . . . 515

S. 269UF: - Purchase of immovable property by Central Government--Tendering of apparent consideration--Scope of section 269UG--Amount can be tendered through Appropriate Authority-- Rai Bahadur G. V. Swaika Estates P. Ltd . v. Chief CIT (Cal) . . . 425

S. 269UG: - Purchase of immovable property by Central Government--Tendering of apparent consideration--Scope of section 269UG--Amount can be tendered through Appropriate Authority-- Rai Bahadur G. V. Swaika Estates P. Ltd . v. Chief CIT (Cal) . . . 425

S. 277: - Offences and prosecution--Fabricating false evidence--Assessee a tax practitioner, submitted return and certificate of tax deduction at source on behalf of client--Refund granted on basis thereof--Certificate found bogus and consequential refund obtained by fraud--Prosecution of assessee--No evidence to show assessee fabricated bogus certificate--No investigation to show client was a fictitious person--Acquittal justified-- ITO v. R. Soundararajan (Mad) . . . 531

Income-tax Rules, 1962 :

r. 3: - Rectification of mistake--Mistake apparent from record--Failure to treat tax paid by employer on behalf of employees as salary for purposes of rule 3--Mistake which could be corrected -- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Salary: - Perquisites--Tax paid by employer on behalf of employee--Part of salary -- Mitsubishi Corporation v. CIT (Delhi) . . . 498

Wealth-tax Act, 1957 :

S. 27A: - Appeal to High Court--Monetary limits for appeals by Department--Instructions of CBDT specifying limit--Exceptions--Substantial question of law likely to arise repeatedly--Assessability of wealth-tax on semi-constructed buildings on urban land--Exception clause (3) of Instruction No. 2 of 2005 applicable--Appeal maintainable-- CWT v. John L. Chackola (Ker) . . . 385