Pages

▼
Showing posts with label HC MUM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HC MUM. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Low Tax Effect Circular is retrospective & dept Must Show “Cascading Effect”

›
  CIT vs. Varsha Dilip Kohle (Bombay High Court) Low Tax Effect Circular is retrospective & dept Must Show "Cascading Eff...
Saturday, July 28, 2012

Whether expenses incurred on corporate film-making is revenue in nature?

›
  Income tax - Whether expenses incurred on corporate film-making is revenue in nature - YES, rules ITAT MUMBAI, NOV 24, 2011: THE...
Tuesday, September 28, 2010

HC (BOM): Circumstances subject to exercise of jurisdiction U/s 263

›
Where the Assessing Officer took a possible view, while passing an order of assessment, the Commissioner exceeded his jurisdiction in seeki...
Thursday, August 26, 2010

HC (MUM):- MAT 80 HHC useful judgment

›
Find attached.
Saturday, August 14, 2010

HC (BOM):- 14A Rule 8 d , defined. Godrej & Boyce vs. DCIT

›
Godrej & Boyce vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court) (435.0 KiB, 806 DLs) Rule 8D r.w. S. 14A (2) is not arbitr...
Tuesday, July 27, 2010

HC (MUM):- ‘Overdraft facility can’t be attached for tax recovery’

›
The taxman does not have claim over the bank overdraft facility of a defaulter since the lender does not owe money, but has promised a loan...
Monday, June 21, 2010

HC (MUM):In order to attract provisions of section 41(1)(a), there must be a remission or cessation of the trading liability and consequently a benefit must enure to assessee.

›
In order to attract provisions of section 41(1)(a), there must be a remission or cessation of the trading liability and consequently a benef...